Harlan Ellison's
Hot Damn! The Kind Men Like



In 1971, at the beginning of the Tijuana Bible resurgence, Harlan Ellison reviewed Socio Library's 'Little "Dirty" Comics' for the first edition of "The Staff".
Harlan's entertaining review is filled with reminiscences of eight pager discovery and youthful sexual wonderment, if you're a fan of his I'm sure you will enjoy it.
The following is as it appeared in 1971 sans several Tijuana Bibles cover examples. Visit HarlanEllison.com for more gems by Harlan.
       copyright© 1971 Harlan Ellison
LITTLE "DIRTY" COMICS
Editorial commentary by R.G. Holt
Socio Library Books, San Diego
1971/$4.75/2!5pp/illustrated

Hot Damn!
The Kind Men Like

HARLAN ELLISON
Thirty, forty years ago, pop culture pornography demeaned women no less, locked men into their silly machismo bag no less, but there was somehow, inexplicably, a less, unsavory ambiance to it than today While I don't think, I'd care for a moment to return to the sexual standards of the Thirties or Forties, there was undeniably a heartier -- let's say more grossly healthy -- tone to the smut. Today, even with the horizon of erotica expanded to include four-color lithographed centerfolds of labia only slightly smaller than the Great Wall of China and, vaginal closeups that make even the most sensual of women look about as appetizing as Ausable Chasm, there is a hYPo- critical air that makes one openly uneasy about enjoying pornography.

My mind rushes to make comparison on this matter with the "legitimacy" of jazz when it came up the river from New Orleans and achieved respectability in Kansas City and Chicago. Got so respectable it legitimized itself into boredom and blandness.

In the halcyon days of yore, pornography was clearly and legally illicit, was in no way compelled to have some sort of "redeeming social value," and so did not walk any ambivalent tightropes or straddle any expeditious fences. It was there to take into the woodshed or the potty, to be used while entertaining oneself with what the scenery artists of "McCabe & Mrs. Miller" refer to as Mary Five-Fingers. It was frankly and openly sleazy, and for all its crudeness and frequent loathsome tastelessness it was honest and straightforward. One did not have to wade through cover lines like "Sexy Pussycats on the Prod" or "The Horrors of Gonorrhea" with their sniggering double entendres or aspirations of social conscience. They were down and dirty, and eliminated all middle-men of Supreme Court decision or over-your-shoulder bluenoses. If you managed to get your hands on some pornography, it had been smuggled in through Customs in some friend's suitcase, or had been muzzily printed on somebody's basement printing press. There was, simply, no fucking around.
It got right down to it.
And for that directness and straightforwardness of purpose it had a breezier, more (peculiar word in this context) decent way With it.

Pause now for nostalgic transition.
Eighth grade at Champion Junior School in Painesville, Ohio, in 1948, was like almost every other Mid- western eighth grade in America that year. Heavy sex entailed not being caught not kissing when the beam turned on you in a game of "flashlight." Bones creak when I think of the term, but it was called "necking" in them days. Oh, there were two wild, carnal creatures named Annette and Patsy whom every guy in the gym class SWORE were letting the members of the football team feel them up(another of those phrases) in the, lumber room behind the wood shop -- al- though on sober reflection across twenty- some years I doubt the val- idity of that charge -- and we be- lieved it because both Annette and Patsy wore their pink angora sweaters VERY tight.
What I'm trying to say is that hardly ANYbody was getting it on to any torrid degree, and to my knowledge NObody was getting any (DAMN those phrases!) though Teddy Beckwith always walked around with a curiously pleased grin.
Thus it was, on a summer day indelibly burned into my ,Memory, during the break between fifth and sixth-periods,at Champion Junior High School in Painesville, Ohio, in 1948, that I passed across the misty frontiers between adolescence and manhood, through the use of a mystical grimoire known in that time, in that place, as " one of those little eight-pagers."
I came into my history class and one of my classmates -- a lad whose face and name have slipped from recollection but whose kind- ness will NEVER be forgotten -- slipped me. first a "Pssst" and then slipped me a folded folio of three stiff-paper sheets, 8-1/2" long x 3" high that made a booklet of eight inner pages and an outer cover 4-1/2" long x 3" high. The drawing on the cover was a fairly accurate rendering of two comic strip characters I knew well, and the title was "Toots and Casper in Paris."
Though Toots and Casper, a hold- over newspaper comic strip of the early Thirties, was by no means my favorite Sunday comics favorite (I was a devotee of Alex Raymond's "Flash Gordon," Chester Gould's "Dick Tracy," Milton Caniff's "Terry and the Pirates" and Harold Foster's "Prince Valiant"), it was a divertissement and enabled me to ignore the chore of copying down endless trivia about something called the Obiter Dictum scrawled on the blackboard by our teacher.
Opening the little comic book, I was confronted by a scene already in progress: Caspar, the milque- toastish hubby of the curvaceous Toots (one wonders how she ever wound up with a wimp like that, and no one with a grain of humility could cast the first stone at her for what she got into in Paris ... or rather to be more specific, what got into her) was being hustled in by a Parisian femme de Joie. She was suggesting in rather broad terms that he par- take of carnal pleasures with her. I remember shaking my head just a bit in confusion. From which Sunday installment was THIS a reprint? I turned the page, to find Toots lying on her Paris hotel bed in a state of dishabille Puck (the mascot of the Comic Weekly) would have found most distracting. As I recall, she had a highly improbable number of fingers on her left hand up her pudenda, and she was contorted in a posture that even my teen-aged eyes construed as writhing. She was bemoaning the fact that she was sans (ladies and those of gentle sensibilities -- not necessarily one and the same -- will excuse the direct quote to which I am impelled by the rigors of honest reportage), "A big, hot cock to shove up my burning quim."
Well, sir.
As I had no idea what a "quim" was, it took me a few perplexed moments to come to a flushed realization of just precisely what the usually demure Toots was lamenting the absence of. When I did, I must, Confess my-eyes bulged. That is one of those literary clichés one encounters in Doe Savage paper- backs and workshop manuscripts submitted by sixteen year olds, but Mother of God they DID bulge, like a pair of overdone oysters.
Hardly had I grasped the moist, one might almost say BURNING significance of that utterance, when my oysters were drawn to the left side of panel 2 wherein Toots lay attempting to assuage her vaginal discomfort. A MAN was climbing in through the window!
Panel 3 showed him ravaging her womb, and commenting sagely on her "long legs and delicious cunny."
Modesty and a certain discomfort in my groin at this very moment of the retelling, forces me to end the panel-by-panel description of this tense little interpersonal quadrangle. Suffice it to say, it was a real eye-opener to me. Whey-faced youth that I was, the rest of that history period was lost on me. To this day I have no bloody idea WHAT in the history of the Holly See the Obiter Dictum portended. When class was ended my now-nameless connection retrieved his precious magic tome, and I wasleft with only a burning bright experience that surely colored all the activities into which I entered as a young man.
To this day I conceive of all Paris hotel rooms as being pre-stocked with not only a bidet, a bilingual editi of the Gideon Bible, and the scent of heliotrope, but equally as well provisioned with a Toots, lying out in peignoir hiked up around her waist, softly lamenting surcease from her diurnal deprivation. If only I knew what a "Cunny" was!

End of nostalgic transition.

The above history is imparted not to convince the reader that this reviewer's puberty was, in fact, achieved, nor even to establish the reviewer's credentials for what follows here, but solely to set forth a happening that was so common-place in those days as to be the rule rather than the exception.
Though it was a pivotal factor in my life, and a secret to be cherished till today, it was equally so for the hundreds of thousands of tottering tots who obtained their first peek into the annals of pornography IN JUST THAT WAY in the Thirties and Forties.
You see, we were a simpler people then.
We bad no X-rated films, no beaver magazines, no live sex acts in cocktail lounges, no topless pizza parlors, and in Painesville, Ohio, we didn't even have hookers and lubricated condoms in the gas station toilets. All we had were lies, dreams, and an occasional 8-pager.

In an "appreciation" functioning as foreword to a marvelous new book titled LITTLE "DIRTY" COMICS, someone named Robert Reitman (and one wonders where publishers come up with these non- entities to introduce books deserving of introductions by more recognizable,prestigious names) points out:
" ... what we in the Middle West in the late Thirties and Forties called 'eight-pagers' (which in the East, I'm told were called, simply 'little dirty books, I and in the West for obvious reasons, 'Tijuana Bibles')," and that is the sermon for the day, gentle readers, a mastrabatory ramble down Memory Lane for those old enough at the time of the battles of Bataan, Kiska and Attu, Saipan, Tunis and Bizerte to know what their penile member could do.

Collected between covers for the first time are twenty-eight complete Tijuana Bibles concerned in intimate detail with the herculean and improbable sexual acti- vities of such comic strip stalwarts as Andy Gump, Orphan Annie, Moon Mullins, Popeye, Dagwood, Dick Tracy, Joe Palooka, Supeman and Steve Canyon (to select at random) and such real-life notables as Mae West, "Baby Face" Nelson and the peripatetic Fuller Brush Man. To be absolutely historically accurate, this may be the SECOND time such a compendium has been assembled, but the FIRST to reach general distribution. However, there is even some reason to doubt the existence, of the "first" collection of 8- pagers: in April of 1965 the gloriously deranged mind of "The Realist's" editor, Paul Krassner, caused to be published a report that Grove Press had assembled a volume titled TILLIE AND MAC: THOSE LITTLE COMMIC BOOKS THAT MEN LIKE, publication of which had been impeded by the district Attorney of the city of New York.
The article went on at some length, dealing with alleged briefs by Grove's attorney before the appellate court, and bore the same stamp of verisimilitude Krassner used to imbue his bogus "sections left out of the Manchester book about the death of JFk." But, though reliable sources assure me the book did, in fact, exist, I am forced to believe it was another Krass- neroid hoax for surely, if Socio Library Books could publish with impunity the volume at hand, a firm as devoted to the making of the buck as Grove would have had THEIR offering already afloat on the sea of commericalism. In any event, whether the Grove Press tome of legend exists or is the product of febrile imagination, we DO have this $4.75 anthology of 8- pagers . . . and it's about time.

As an art-form, the 8-pager is long-overdue for critical attention. Stylized to almost the rigid form of a fugue, the 8-pager at its best dealt with utterly familiar dramatis per- sonae from the world of comix and mass entertainment and yellow headlines and get up in one or two panels the "situation" in which the protagonist -- Wimpy, Jungle jim, Snuffy Smith -- might find himself. It was without exception a circumstance surely only existent in the fever-dreams of schoolboys who accepted the Great Sex Myth Images of the Thirties and Forties: the rich nympho in the Rolls Royce, the farmer's daughter, the unsatisfied birde on her honeymoon night morning,,the girls, of easy virtue, and the housewives who lay panting in wait for traveling salesmen. That these archetypes existed in reality need not be disputed, but if one were to take as matter of fact the frequency with which horny heroes stumbled upon such ladies in these little pictorials, one would not for a moment question why it is that the world is overcrowded today.

By panel three or four, usually, the pig protagonist was already "ravaging the flue" of the ready- made rape victim. And by panels five or six the young lady was in advanced stages of coitus exsul- tatio. (It should be pointed Out that even the snerdiest of male attackers in these comix possessed penial organs of a size and potency fit only to satisfy a female lust on par with that of Catherine the Great of Russia, whose amatory desires tended toward heavyweight affairs equine paramours. I can easily understand how it is that so many men of my generation were hung up on the size of their organs; one glance at Popeye's spinach-fortified sidesplitter lurching toward even the capacious maw of Mae West, and one would be shamed into soldering one's zipper shut for life.)

And with what little justice there is in this harsh and unjust world, Women's Liberationists can ameliorate their loathing of such documents in which women are even LESS than sex objects -- are in fact, merely talking meat -- by the inevitable denouement, in which the guy ALWAYS gets one-upped, made to look like a boob or an asshole or both,or is singularly and royally fucked-over by the ravishee. While many there may be who conceive ,of these little sex-dramas as utter trash, it is beyond question that they, formed a hitherto-unexplored and possibly very important part of the pop culture thinking of three decades of American males, God help us.
For this reason, and for the purer motivation of sly pleasure at seeing Little Orphan Annie screwed by Sandy, the otherwise pristine Ella Cinders being thoroughly rumpled by a grossly anti-Semitic stereotype, or the high-and-mighty Superman failing to get it up, up and awaaay . . . this is a book deserving of preservation.

Four of the 8-pagers are In color, and the rest have been reproduced flawlessly, down to the last near-illegible obscenity scrawled on the walls. Obviously the book is a commercial venture, despite its festoonery of "redeem- ing social comment," but this is one of those instances where the huck- sters have- done us a good turn. Handed from paw to sweaty paw by schoolboys blighted by terminal acne, surely in a few more years all of these comix would have been lost to us. Preservation of the past is, in and of itself, a noble act. And while our current age of sexual permissiveness finds these epics dated and more than a trifle silly, still it WAS a time that existed, and these 8-pagers were a reflection of the morals and manners of the day.

Quite apart from their salacious value, which surely must be negligible in a day when one can lay out a couple of bucks and see, if not Deborah Kerr or Faye Dunaway or Glenda Jackson getting it on in the buff, at least DAISY LAY OF THE OZARKS, quite apart from that now-serendipitous value, the notes and introduction by R. G. Holt are cogent, barely pompous, and intelligently observant.

At $4 75 for a large paperback, one might conceive of this book as overpriced, but when one stops to consider that as schoolboys we paid from a buck to five bucks just to cop ONE of these little darlins, to five bucks for twenty- eight offeringsisahelluvabargain. Hell, in those days Id've paid five bucks just to find out what "cunny" meant.  

copyright ©1971 Harlan Ellison
 


    Tijuana_Bibles
Main Page
Harlan Ellison's
Hot Damn! The Kind Men Like
 
 

all artwork and text copyright © 2003 TijuanaBible.org except where indicated